Log In

Twitter is cybernetic telepathy

Do any other elowelers use twitter?

I do, now. When twitter was first released I observed the phenomena from afar and never signed up or really browsed the site. For whatever reason I kept myself semi-purposefully ignorant of the site for the first three years of it's existence.

I was even somewhat hostile to the whole idea. People hammering out the minutiae of there lives 140 characters at a time -- what a bore! And cute verbs for the whole affair... the whole lot of twitterers "tweat"-ing or "chirp"-ing or worse.

But a week ago my boss and a dude from a neighbouring department were talking about how they got turned on to twitter, my boss had set up a second account as his kitten and was microblogging the kittens activities alongside his own. My co-worker who had let my boss have a sip of the twitteraid had gone to some twitter-centric social events.

It sounded like a good party, so I signed up (as Maximus_Freeman).

Twitter is really fascinating in that it provides an avenue for mass-chatting along two key communication channels: the web and SMS. Through twitter event and topic based groupings can arise such as the ongoing portland winter storm watch which provides up to the minute weather intelligence as sighted by human (and sometimes robot) observers in the general Portland area. At times the stream of postings provide a more global gestalt of a topic, such as the twitter recommended #haiku.

Key to twitter's awesome is the content targeting and indexing that's done of each post. For example, based on some vector of location, phrase frequency over time twitter will list trends, so that when I woke up this morning #pdxtst was a trend listed on the front page of the ever so comprehensive search.twitter.com.

Predominantly though the posts you're exposed to on twitter are the posts of your friends and conversations (private or public) that naturally arise therein. There's also an option to subscribe to "device updates" from an accounts friends, this means that a text message will be sent to the phone associated to the account whenever that user updates. It's also possible to have all replies to an account forwarded to a phone AND most importantly: it is possible to post over text message, friend people over text message, subscribe to someone over text message, etc. etc.

SMS access and a strong API for other services to make contact with twitter makes twitter super accessible (and truly present outside of the web), it allows users to subscribe to thoughts about topics or thoughts from their friends then receive the information however they choose in a constant stream. The mandatory short and succinct style of the messages makes this constant stream manageable and usable.

It's a new age in the evolution of human consciousness!

Avatar zanna
12-17-08 22:38
gibts keine hier
Hum, I think you are kinda right about the telepathy thing. We may not be able to beam thoughts directly into each other's heads (wait a while, it'll probably happen), but we can beam little messages to people's cell phones. I don't know whether to be stoked that that's even possible, or really creeped out.

(Also, creep and all its related words look pretty weird . . . creeper, creeping, etc. And evidently creeped isn't in the dictionary, but I can't think of how else you would spell it!)
Avatar max *
12-17-08 22:53
cyber desperado
Exactly, we can beam around messages to devices we then read... It could be more direct, some device could compose our thoughts into a discreet message and transmit it so it could be directly perceived whomever.

Either way we require some sort of mechanical aid to do any of this at present. Though given a choice of no telepathy vs. cybernetic telepathy I'd have to choose the current state of affairs.

What's key about Twitter is that it changes the immediacy and potential impact of our text packets.
Avatar spencer
12-18-08 00:31
Be the change.
To devolve to a creature of the social networking age and only address the most insignificant part of your post:

Why yes, I am on Twitter. I post oodles and scads more often than I do on Elowel.

I find it interesting, the way blogging has worked for me as opposed to Twitter. I weaned myself off of blogging because I didn't see much merit in event recaps. Blogs were acceptable mediums for analytical thought, or perhaps low-level journalism, but daily minutia blogs just seemed like a bastardization of the medium.

Twitter, on the other hand, was clearly designed for those minutia. Sometimes, I just want to share the random thought that comes into my head. Making a blog post about it seems wasteful-- like getting a big, fancy journal and writing only three words on every page. Twitter's the little scratchpad I keep in my pocket, for the little things I want to share.
Avatar yourworstenemy *
12-18-08 02:52
Your Best Friend
I...will...resist...the urge...to join....!!!
Avatar zanna
12-18-08 11:02
gibts keine hier
Aw, now I feel like I've abused blogging by using it as the big fancy journal, but only writing a few words on it. That's also why my posts often have lots of odds and ends, lol.

I don't know if I will join twitter or not. I mean, since I don't have an SMS-capable phone, it wouldn't be very portable. I would just have to do it online, which seems like it misses the point a bit. =P
page generation: 0.057s (20.4% in 8 sqls) | cpu load: 0.00 | temperature: 104F
2007 elowel.org